Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-04-18 11:48 CDT |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Docs | Wiki | Repositories |
Relationship Graph | [ View Issue ] [ Dependency Graph ] | |||
|
||||
|
Viewing Issue Simple Details | |||||
ID | Category | Type | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0000658 | [In-Portal CMS] Optimization | task | N/A | 2010-03-27 17:18 | 2012-07-25 05:33 |
Reporter | Dmitry | View Status | public | ||
Assigned To | alex | ||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||
Status | closed | ||||
Summary | 0000658: Extremely Long Priority numbers stored in Cache for "Parsed Sections" | ||||
Description |
Hi all, I think we have a little bug/issue in parsed_sections serialized array that is stored in Cache table. Some records have super long Priority numbers. I know we don't use/put this long digits so it must something auto-calculated or something. here is an example: s:1:"r";s:15:"no_pass_through";i:1;}s:11:"permissions";a:2:{i:0;s: 4:"view";i:1;s:4:"edit";}s:8:"priority";d: 4.29999999999999982236431605997495353221893310546875;s:4:"type";i:1;s: 13:"SectionPrefix There not too many of this, but I thin k we should bring it to the human read format and safe a bit of DB space ;) |
||||
Additional Information |
Plan: 1. convert all priorities to strings before storing them in database 2. attach sections_parsed cache size before and after the fix |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Docs | Wiki | Repositories |
Web Development by Intechnic In-Portal Open Source CMS |